provided by: www.bigoo.ws
Total Pageviews
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
Saturday, December 1, 2007
CAIR Will Care
CAIR is nothing more than a fund raising tool for radical Muslims, is being taken to court by Michael Savage. His lawyer; Daniel Horowitz, a devout liberal who understands the importance of free speech for all. CAIR has not been held accountable for their actions, their goal is to create a Muslim America and to funnel money around the world to other Muslims who want to convert all to Islam, either by choice or by force. Go get em' brother Mike!
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/staticarticles/article58970.html
The focal point of the lawsuit is a series of audio clips CAIR has been using in its promotions and fundraising efforts.
Those comments from Savage's show include his criticisms of Islam and Muslims, including:
"I'm not gonna put my wife in a hijab. And I'm not gonna put my daughter in a burqa. And I'm not getting' on my all-fours and braying to Mecca. And you could drop dead if you don't like it. You can shove it up your pipe. I don't wanna hear any more about Islam. I don't wanna hear one more word about Islam. Take your religion and shove it up your behind. I'm sick of you."
But the lawsuit maintains such comments, taken in context, are Savage's verbal expression of the feelings of many Americans.....
"The audience of 'The Savage Nation' expects this type of from-the-heart outrage and when it is directed at a murderer such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his ilk, the piece is far more understandable and far more American mainstream. While the strength of the outrage is remarkable and a hallmark of 'The Savage Nation,' the sentiment is shared by a huge number of Americans," the lawsuit said.
"The copyright material properly viewed is a scream of outrage on behalf of the American public against beheadings, hangings of homosexuals, mutilation of women, the torture of rape victims and the thought that CAIR and other groups are trying to import these atrocities into American life," the lawsuit said.
May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't.- General George Patton Jr
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/staticarticles/article58970.html
The focal point of the lawsuit is a series of audio clips CAIR has been using in its promotions and fundraising efforts.
Those comments from Savage's show include his criticisms of Islam and Muslims, including:
"I'm not gonna put my wife in a hijab. And I'm not gonna put my daughter in a burqa. And I'm not getting' on my all-fours and braying to Mecca. And you could drop dead if you don't like it. You can shove it up your pipe. I don't wanna hear any more about Islam. I don't wanna hear one more word about Islam. Take your religion and shove it up your behind. I'm sick of you."
But the lawsuit maintains such comments, taken in context, are Savage's verbal expression of the feelings of many Americans.....
"The audience of 'The Savage Nation' expects this type of from-the-heart outrage and when it is directed at a murderer such as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his ilk, the piece is far more understandable and far more American mainstream. While the strength of the outrage is remarkable and a hallmark of 'The Savage Nation,' the sentiment is shared by a huge number of Americans," the lawsuit said.
"The copyright material properly viewed is a scream of outrage on behalf of the American public against beheadings, hangings of homosexuals, mutilation of women, the torture of rape victims and the thought that CAIR and other groups are trying to import these atrocities into American life," the lawsuit said.
May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't.- General George Patton Jr
Saturday, November 24, 2007
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Friday, November 9, 2007
Nazis and Islamist
I have been saying this for years that Islamo-facist are they new Nazis. Here is an editorial from the Washington Post that is very well written and thought out.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071107/EDITORIAL/111070001/1013/editorial
The parallels between Nazism and Islamism are overwhelming. Yet the subject is a taboo. When last March the German historian Matthias Kuentzel, author of "Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11," was to give a lecture at the University of Leeds (Britain), the university authorities cancelled the lecture after threats from Muslim students.
There is a war going on between the Jihadists and the West. We are losing the battle because, as so often in man's history, our political leaders think that they are still fighting the previous war. Europeans who warn against the danger of Islamism are considered — and sometimes even prosecuted — as xenophobes, racists, even neo-Nazis.
The European left, in league with the Islamists, is constantly reminding the Europeans of Hitler and the Nazis, accusing Europe's identity, the very core of its being, of being intrinsically evil. Hence, attempts to rob Europe of its identity are seen as "good," even when those eager to eradicate this identity leave no doubt that they will eradicate the Jews first.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/article/20071107/EDITORIAL/111070001/1013/editorial
The parallels between Nazism and Islamism are overwhelming. Yet the subject is a taboo. When last March the German historian Matthias Kuentzel, author of "Jihad and Jew-Hatred: Islamism, Nazism and the Roots of 9/11," was to give a lecture at the University of Leeds (Britain), the university authorities cancelled the lecture after threats from Muslim students.
There is a war going on between the Jihadists and the West. We are losing the battle because, as so often in man's history, our political leaders think that they are still fighting the previous war. Europeans who warn against the danger of Islamism are considered — and sometimes even prosecuted — as xenophobes, racists, even neo-Nazis.
The European left, in league with the Islamists, is constantly reminding the Europeans of Hitler and the Nazis, accusing Europe's identity, the very core of its being, of being intrinsically evil. Hence, attempts to rob Europe of its identity are seen as "good," even when those eager to eradicate this identity leave no doubt that they will eradicate the Jews first.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Blowing Up Blasko
Blasko is just another guy who wants open borders...Period! Just another person who would like to do away with our country's border, language and culture(yes, Dr. Savage says it best) and watch our great nation sprial downward into a third world cess pool. Yes Mr. Blasko, plain and simple terms describe best what you and your ilk would like to do to our nation. By the way, the economic drain created by illegals on our social services far out weigh their so called "contributions. Here is his post on Bmoore's blog.
http://thehive.modbee.com/?q=node/5497
Here is his page of views...
http://www.level4press.com/larryblasko.html
“Stop Playing Politics with People’s Lives, and Face Reality. We have No Border!”
Larry Blasko: Border? What Border?
Item#: AuthorLarryBlasko
Product DescriptionEvery day tens of thousands of illegal immigrants stream north across the border, overtaxing our healthcare and education system and bringing drugs, disease, and potential terrorists across the border with them. In spite of this, in his book Opening the Borders Larry Blasko suggests that the best solution is not a closed border, but an open border policy similar to that enjoyed in the European Union by member countries.After more than three decades with the Associated Press, Larry Blasko speaks out! “ Immigration—and the opposition to it—has been a recurring theme of American life since at least the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, and if you count the understandable distaste of native Americans for the gun-toting folks who showed up uninvited, long before that.” Irreverent, no-holds-barred fighting • One of the greatest fables of our age is that there is a border between Mexico and the United States.• Remember those horrible business folk that exploit illegal day labor? Turns out, according to the study, that 49 percent of the laborers are primarily employed by homeowners or renters. Must give the homeowners or renters enough free time away from their chores to attend anti-immigration rallies.• One of the most entertaining fictions gamboling about in the current debate about illegal, mostly Mexican, immigration is that we should deport these 12 million souls back to their country of origin and make them apply for readmission as “guest workers.”• The American attitude that folk in other countries are really just Americans who talk funny, sets us up to ignore fundamental cultural differences, that generate different outcomes than we expected.• Of the many whacko notions that abound in politics both north and south of the U.S./Mexican border, two enjoy a limited currency among those who write more than they read. First is the notion of La Reconquista, certainly a strong finalist for Dumbest of The Dumb Society’s annual Dum-De-Dum-Dum(D-quad) Cup. Second is the flip side notion, that the U.S. annex Mexico, another strong D-quad contender.
http://thehive.modbee.com/?q=node/5497
Here is his page of views...
http://www.level4press.com/larryblasko.html
“Stop Playing Politics with People’s Lives, and Face Reality. We have No Border!”
Larry Blasko: Border? What Border?
Item#: AuthorLarryBlasko
Product DescriptionEvery day tens of thousands of illegal immigrants stream north across the border, overtaxing our healthcare and education system and bringing drugs, disease, and potential terrorists across the border with them. In spite of this, in his book Opening the Borders Larry Blasko suggests that the best solution is not a closed border, but an open border policy similar to that enjoyed in the European Union by member countries.After more than three decades with the Associated Press, Larry Blasko speaks out! “ Immigration—and the opposition to it—has been a recurring theme of American life since at least the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, and if you count the understandable distaste of native Americans for the gun-toting folks who showed up uninvited, long before that.” Irreverent, no-holds-barred fighting • One of the greatest fables of our age is that there is a border between Mexico and the United States.• Remember those horrible business folk that exploit illegal day labor? Turns out, according to the study, that 49 percent of the laborers are primarily employed by homeowners or renters. Must give the homeowners or renters enough free time away from their chores to attend anti-immigration rallies.• One of the most entertaining fictions gamboling about in the current debate about illegal, mostly Mexican, immigration is that we should deport these 12 million souls back to their country of origin and make them apply for readmission as “guest workers.”• The American attitude that folk in other countries are really just Americans who talk funny, sets us up to ignore fundamental cultural differences, that generate different outcomes than we expected.• Of the many whacko notions that abound in politics both north and south of the U.S./Mexican border, two enjoy a limited currency among those who write more than they read. First is the notion of La Reconquista, certainly a strong finalist for Dumbest of The Dumb Society’s annual Dum-De-Dum-Dum(D-quad) Cup. Second is the flip side notion, that the U.S. annex Mexico, another strong D-quad contender.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
