If you think China is American friendly, think again. They have been buying and stealing our secrets for years. There is not enough space to document their human rights violations. Many a current and former politician has profited off of the Chinese. Just checkout Di Fi and her hubby. I blogged about this awhile ago. And now their body armour has been found on one of our enemies in Iraq. Why we continue do do business with the Evil Red Empire is beyond me. They are building the world's strongest armies. And it is not just for self protection. Sad part of this is, they are doing this with our money. We need a president who will cut off all trade with China. Unless I or someone who realizes the threat China poses, it will never happen.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=67407
When you think of China, inexpensive and inferior goods might come to mind.
But that's hardly the case with the Chinese body armor found on Iraqi insurgents.
It is superior to anything available to U.S. troops and resists penetration from M16s, M4s, M80s, M60s and M240 machine guns. In fact, say U.S. military sources, the only thing it won't defeat is a direct shot from a .50 caliber
Chinese military supplies are thought to be entering Iraq through Iran, with whom Beijing maintains good relations.
But, according to Bill Gertz's book, "Treachery: How America's Friends and Foes Are Secretly Arming Our Enemies," China long has provided at least some military support to al-Qaida and the Taliban, as well as Shiite militia forces.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Saturday, July 26, 2008
MahatmObama
You may find this article interesting. Where I think the article is spot on is how the break down of the family unit and the removal of God from our public life has lead some people who want something to "believe" and trust in. Since we are being told by many on the left that a family is whatever you want it to be and that God is not where are morals and laws derive from, it is natural for many to be duped into the socialist/Marxist abyss.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/obama_the_messiah_of_generatio.html
So what is the source of this infatuation with Obama? How to explain the hysteria? The religious fervor? The devotion? The weeping and fainting and utter euphoria surrounding a candidate who had the audacity to run for leader of the free world on a platform of mere hope?
If anthropologists made predictions the way meteorologists do, they might have anticipated Obama's astronomical rise to supernova status in 2008 of the Common Era. Consider the cultural coordinates, and Obama's intersection with history becomes almost inevitable.
To play weatherman for a moment, he is a perfect storm of the culture of narcissism, the cult of celebrity, and a secular society in which fathers (both the holy and the secular) have been increasingly marginalized from the lives of a generation of young Americans.
All of these trends have been gaining momentum the past few decades. Social critic Christopher Lasch named the culture of narcissism a generation ago and cited addiction to celebrity as one of the disease's symptoms -- all tied to the decline of the family.....
Here's how a 20-year-old woman in Seattle described that Obama feeling: "When he was talking about hope, it actually almost made me cry. Like it really made sense, like, for the first, like, whoa ... "
This New Age glossolalia may be more sonorous than the guttural emanations from the revival tent, but the emotion is the same. It's all religion by any other name.
Whatever the Church of Obama promises, we should not mistake this movement for a renaissance of reason. It is more like, well, like whoa.
When I here MahatamObama speak, the word "Movement" does come to mind, but the kind where you need a magazine and a candle!
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/02/obama_the_messiah_of_generatio.html
So what is the source of this infatuation with Obama? How to explain the hysteria? The religious fervor? The devotion? The weeping and fainting and utter euphoria surrounding a candidate who had the audacity to run for leader of the free world on a platform of mere hope?
If anthropologists made predictions the way meteorologists do, they might have anticipated Obama's astronomical rise to supernova status in 2008 of the Common Era. Consider the cultural coordinates, and Obama's intersection with history becomes almost inevitable.
To play weatherman for a moment, he is a perfect storm of the culture of narcissism, the cult of celebrity, and a secular society in which fathers (both the holy and the secular) have been increasingly marginalized from the lives of a generation of young Americans.
All of these trends have been gaining momentum the past few decades. Social critic Christopher Lasch named the culture of narcissism a generation ago and cited addiction to celebrity as one of the disease's symptoms -- all tied to the decline of the family.....
Here's how a 20-year-old woman in Seattle described that Obama feeling: "When he was talking about hope, it actually almost made me cry. Like it really made sense, like, for the first, like, whoa ... "
This New Age glossolalia may be more sonorous than the guttural emanations from the revival tent, but the emotion is the same. It's all religion by any other name.
Whatever the Church of Obama promises, we should not mistake this movement for a renaissance of reason. It is more like, well, like whoa.
When I here MahatamObama speak, the word "Movement" does come to mind, but the kind where you need a magazine and a candle!
Prophet Obama; World Citizen National Disgrace
If one does not believe Barry to be bad for America, then read what his bill in the senate will do if passed.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=70308
The U.S. Senate soon could debate whether you, your spouse and each of your children – as well as your in-laws, parents, grandparents, neighbors and everyone else in America – each will spend $2,500 or more to reduce poverty around the world.
The plan sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, is estimated to cost the U.S. some $845 billion over the coming few years in an effort to raise the standard of living around the globe.....if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years, he said, would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."
And here is the the messhiah Barry in his own words "Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.
"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere,"
Sorry messiah B, it is not our job and unfortunately we still support the UN. If private organizations want to donate to the poor of the world, then great. But for our government to do it is wrong. We need to keep our wealth in our country. But Barry Hussein and those like him who want a socilalist or Marxist One World Order are the most dangerous enemy of all: They are inside our gates, they pander to the emotions of people, they tell us how bad and mean we are. That if a hardworking American earns more than $250,000 a year they are wealthy, thus evil. That all people should share in the rewards of hard work and effort, even if they don't earn it.
Bottom line: America is quickly approaching a fork in the political road. Turn right and drive back towards the light of rugged individualism and self support with limited government intervention. Or turn left towards the dark shadows of liberalism/socialism/ Marxism. Where the government is your nanny, providing Pamper to Depends care for all. Where our laws are second to the international court. Where there are no borders. Where freedom of speech is labeled Hate Speech. Plain and simple: It is a path to evil.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=70308
The U.S. Senate soon could debate whether you, your spouse and each of your children – as well as your in-laws, parents, grandparents, neighbors and everyone else in America – each will spend $2,500 or more to reduce poverty around the world.
The plan sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, is estimated to cost the U.S. some $845 billion over the coming few years in an effort to raise the standard of living around the globe.....if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years, he said, would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."
And here is the the messhiah Barry in his own words "Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.
"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere,"
Sorry messiah B, it is not our job and unfortunately we still support the UN. If private organizations want to donate to the poor of the world, then great. But for our government to do it is wrong. We need to keep our wealth in our country. But Barry Hussein and those like him who want a socilalist or Marxist One World Order are the most dangerous enemy of all: They are inside our gates, they pander to the emotions of people, they tell us how bad and mean we are. That if a hardworking American earns more than $250,000 a year they are wealthy, thus evil. That all people should share in the rewards of hard work and effort, even if they don't earn it.
Bottom line: America is quickly approaching a fork in the political road. Turn right and drive back towards the light of rugged individualism and self support with limited government intervention. Or turn left towards the dark shadows of liberalism/socialism/ Marxism. Where the government is your nanny, providing Pamper to Depends care for all. Where our laws are second to the international court. Where there are no borders. Where freedom of speech is labeled Hate Speech. Plain and simple: It is a path to evil.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
From The Uppity Woman
I love this blog. While she is not a hard right winger like yours truly, she knows the evil that is Barry Hussein. Here is a snippet from her post today. Enjoy!
Hey! Who Let Reality In?
Posted on July 24, 2008 by Uppity Woman
I was just catching FOX news and it appears Obama wanted to know how it is FOX got hookups in all those military bases where he performed his shameless photo opportunities? It seems paranoid Narcissist Obama believed it was by Presidential Executive Order that his reverie and comfort with his Worship Trip was interrupted by the potential that somebody might actually capture and report something that isn’t set up as a photo op a not-so-Kodak moment about the Great One.
As it turns out, the troops get to request which news outlets they prefer and FOX is always included. Yes, Barack, sometimes you just can’t control everything around your own self-absorbed world. Sometimes, people get choices. I know this is hard for you to believe, since your entire candidacy has been an Axelrod production.
Hey! Who Let Reality In?
Posted on July 24, 2008 by Uppity Woman
I was just catching FOX news and it appears Obama wanted to know how it is FOX got hookups in all those military bases where he performed his shameless photo opportunities? It seems paranoid Narcissist Obama believed it was by Presidential Executive Order that his reverie and comfort with his Worship Trip was interrupted by the potential that somebody might actually capture and report something that isn’t set up as a photo op a not-so-Kodak moment about the Great One.
As it turns out, the troops get to request which news outlets they prefer and FOX is always included. Yes, Barack, sometimes you just can’t control everything around your own self-absorbed world. Sometimes, people get choices. I know this is hard for you to believe, since your entire candidacy has been an Axelrod production.
Barry Hussein And Wealth ReDistribution
It is bad enough Barry is on his Mystical Magical Campaign Tour, but to make a statement that "The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand...."http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25825692/
Say what? Let's take the most important country, the USA. So with this with statement we will be sharing "Our" hard earned wealth with our neighbors to the south. Many a corrupt and Marxist regimes are down there. What is next, sharing with Cuba? Barry outed himself to the world and there are enough anti American, anti freedom pro Marxist, socialist countries that would love to have a piece of Uncle Sam's pie! We have seen it with the Global warming freaks. Global warming is nothing more than a scam to suck money from the USA. Heck, Al Gordo has rode this myth all the way to the bank and a Noble Poop Prize.
Barry is a pro wealth redistributor, make no mistake about it. This alone, should disqualify him from recieving a vote from any well informed American.
"But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many."http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25825692/
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.
Society does not consist of individuals but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand. Karl Marx
Say what? Let's take the most important country, the USA. So with this with statement we will be sharing "Our" hard earned wealth with our neighbors to the south. Many a corrupt and Marxist regimes are down there. What is next, sharing with Cuba? Barry outed himself to the world and there are enough anti American, anti freedom pro Marxist, socialist countries that would love to have a piece of Uncle Sam's pie! We have seen it with the Global warming freaks. Global warming is nothing more than a scam to suck money from the USA. Heck, Al Gordo has rode this myth all the way to the bank and a Noble Poop Prize.
Barry is a pro wealth redistributor, make no mistake about it. This alone, should disqualify him from recieving a vote from any well informed American.
"But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many."http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25825692/
The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.
Society does not consist of individuals but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand. Karl Marx
Sunday, July 20, 2008
The Unfairness of the Fairness Doctrine
The fairness doctrine would bring anything but fairness to the airwaves. The original intent of the regulation was to give conflicting points of views equal air time. It was done away with, thanks to President Reagan and the FCC in 1987. The FCC realized that it failed to encourage discussions of issues of importance. I am sure there must have been some 1st Amendment issues too.
Supporters of the doctrine say that the vast majority of talk radio shows only provide one side of most issues and thus the need for federal regulation. Wrong, while it is true that conservative talk radio dominates the airwaves, there is nothing stopping liberal talk shows from being aired, other than the fact there is not a market for them because of the lack of an intelligent message and quality host. There are also many other choices now available to the liberal ears and eyes: The Internet, newspapers, magazines and t.v. There are many more sources now than ever before.
The doctrine puts a ton of power into the FCC's hands. Who will determine what is "Fair"? How will "Fair" be defined? It would give a president or a politician the ability to influence what is being said about them and their job performance. And there is no guarantee that more programs will be broadcast. Most station owners will be in fear of violating the doctrine thus receiving fines that could drive them out of business. So sounds like more cheesy 70's music and Paul Harvey. And Christian radio will become extinct. How is that fair?
The fairness doctrine will bring on government run radio. It, in my opinion, will lead to air wave, print and Internet fairness doctrines. The only views will be that of "The Man" and the end result will be The Belief Doctrine; punishable by incarceration in a thought reprogramming detention center.
Supporters of the doctrine say that the vast majority of talk radio shows only provide one side of most issues and thus the need for federal regulation. Wrong, while it is true that conservative talk radio dominates the airwaves, there is nothing stopping liberal talk shows from being aired, other than the fact there is not a market for them because of the lack of an intelligent message and quality host. There are also many other choices now available to the liberal ears and eyes: The Internet, newspapers, magazines and t.v. There are many more sources now than ever before.
The doctrine puts a ton of power into the FCC's hands. Who will determine what is "Fair"? How will "Fair" be defined? It would give a president or a politician the ability to influence what is being said about them and their job performance. And there is no guarantee that more programs will be broadcast. Most station owners will be in fear of violating the doctrine thus receiving fines that could drive them out of business. So sounds like more cheesy 70's music and Paul Harvey. And Christian radio will become extinct. How is that fair?
The fairness doctrine will bring on government run radio. It, in my opinion, will lead to air wave, print and Internet fairness doctrines. The only views will be that of "The Man" and the end result will be The Belief Doctrine; punishable by incarceration in a thought reprogramming detention center.
He Wants To Be A Modesto City Councilman
Robert Stanford hopes to represent Modesto citizens someday. But his future opponents need to be aware; if you use his own words against him he will threaten to silence you by contacting your employer. I do not even live in Modesto and he has made this threat against me. I have collected many of his written words and posted them as an attempt to show he would not be a good council member. I have family in Modesto and would not want them to have him as a council member.
Robert made himself a public figure when he ran for a council seat awhile back. His veiws are out there for all the public to see. So using his words to build a case against electing him is fair. I highlighted the lowlights.
Here is his post/threat directed at me. Enjoy!
Stanford4Modesto Says:
First - don't belileve everything you read or hear from me or anyone else.
Second - liberal/conservative what's the difference? None - except when you fill out your ballot.
Some of the kindest hearts I know spew hate like JHeaton about "illegals" but will do anything in the world to help them out.
Of course I don't think JHeaton falls into that category.
Go ahead and collect those quotes JHeaton - I'm collecting my own - remember, I know your name and where you work - maybe I can get on my Jew tri-cycle one day and let people know what's going on in this not too secret underground life of yours.
If Activist1 can call Gmaudlin's work and try and get him fired, then maybe I can do the same to you.
Come and get me big boy - just don't exert yourself too much or you might make my job around here a weeeee bit easier.
Robert Stanford
Robert made himself a public figure when he ran for a council seat awhile back. His veiws are out there for all the public to see. So using his words to build a case against electing him is fair. I highlighted the lowlights.
Here is his post/threat directed at me. Enjoy!
Stanford4Modesto Says:
First - don't belileve everything you read or hear from me or anyone else.
Second - liberal/conservative what's the difference? None - except when you fill out your ballot.
Some of the kindest hearts I know spew hate like JHeaton about "illegals" but will do anything in the world to help them out.
Of course I don't think JHeaton falls into that category.
Go ahead and collect those quotes JHeaton - I'm collecting my own - remember, I know your name and where you work - maybe I can get on my Jew tri-cycle one day and let people know what's going on in this not too secret underground life of yours.
If Activist1 can call Gmaudlin's work and try and get him fired, then maybe I can do the same to you.
Come and get me big boy - just don't exert yourself too much or you might make my job around here a weeeee bit easier.
Robert Stanford
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)