With the Bee's article today stating:
— Many immigrants have moved out. The percentage of foreign-born residents was lower in 2008 than the year before, as was the percentage of non-citizens.
— White, non-Hispanic residents became a minority in Stanislaus County last year for the first time.
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/863567.html
I wouild ask two questions? Is the word immigrant being used in place of "illegal" and who cares what the color or racial make up is of the local population is as long as everyone is a legal resident? Of course the vast majority are illegals. Why I am asking these questions that most writers will not, "How many of the "immigrants" are fluent in English? Speaking and writing English is imporatnt for doing well in school and life here in America. There is an upside to "immigrants" leaving the area, less stress on social services the illegals are not entitled to thus spending less of my tax dollar. Test scores in school going up, less need for bi-lingual support and classes, heck, less traffic and crime. Sounds like a win win win situation. Let's hope the trend continues with "immigrants."
I am all for legal immigration as long as the numbers are regulated and background checks are done. As for the illegal immigrants? They can't self deport fast enough! And thanks for trashing our nation.
Typo of fluid for fluent fixed thanks to the keen eye of a product of illegal aliens......Wow, finaly a contribution to our country RicardoPee!
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Emerson Drake: Words Of A LIar
For those of you who are new readers here, and I appreciate the new ones for the e-mails, Emerson Drake is also known as the blogger truthseekers. I can tell you from personal experience he is a liar. I spoke with him, in person, a few years back and he was polite, and well spoken, and we had a good conversation. No name calling or anything mean spirited. Of course that has changed since he is a Jekyll and Hyde character. So a big your welcome to those who were curious to who the screen names that whines and lies is. And here is some more hubris from the lumpy dude in the Don Ho shirt!
http://thehive.modbee.com/node/15676#new
Greeed, Special Interests, Developers and Two City Council Candidates...
Submitted by truthseekers on Sun, 2009-09-20 05:27.
Consumers
General Debate
Politics/Social Action
Well it's quickly becoming politics as usual in Modesto. Two candidates that have heavily financed campaigns due to developers, Real Estate groups who are salavating at the prospect and certain "business" groups who would ask the taxpayers and ratepayers of Modesto to finance their dreams of averice.
Joe Muratore and Kristin Olsen represent special interest groups and not the people of Modesto.
One shining example is Measure "M" which is an advisory question regarding five areas in North Modesto they want us to annex. Now if we do, it's a certainity that water and sewer rates will rise in order to lay the ground work for their greed. I ask you, is that what we want? Can you afford to take money out of the mouths of your family and give it to some of the same developers who brought us the Village I debacle?
It's bad enough that "M" is an advisory vote which means the City Council can damn well do what ever it feels like it regardless of the vote.
That's why we need to take a serious look at what the candidates really stand for and not just their claims.
Is Olsen an independent voice? Not by her actions or her connections and not by the money she's collected so far. The very same can be said about Joe Muratore. Much of their money flows from the same spigot. How do you think they collected the sums they have so far?
Of the seven people running for City Council in Modesto these two(Muratore and Olsen)are most closely linked to people who are concerned about lining their pockets with money they will take from us. Yes us the taxpayers, the rate payers...the Citizens of Modesto.
»
truthseekers's blog
http://thehive.modbee.com/node/15676#new
Greeed, Special Interests, Developers and Two City Council Candidates...
Submitted by truthseekers on Sun, 2009-09-20 05:27.
Consumers
General Debate
Politics/Social Action
Well it's quickly becoming politics as usual in Modesto. Two candidates that have heavily financed campaigns due to developers, Real Estate groups who are salavating at the prospect and certain "business" groups who would ask the taxpayers and ratepayers of Modesto to finance their dreams of averice.
Joe Muratore and Kristin Olsen represent special interest groups and not the people of Modesto.
One shining example is Measure "M" which is an advisory question regarding five areas in North Modesto they want us to annex. Now if we do, it's a certainity that water and sewer rates will rise in order to lay the ground work for their greed. I ask you, is that what we want? Can you afford to take money out of the mouths of your family and give it to some of the same developers who brought us the Village I debacle?
It's bad enough that "M" is an advisory vote which means the City Council can damn well do what ever it feels like it regardless of the vote.
That's why we need to take a serious look at what the candidates really stand for and not just their claims.
Is Olsen an independent voice? Not by her actions or her connections and not by the money she's collected so far. The very same can be said about Joe Muratore. Much of their money flows from the same spigot. How do you think they collected the sums they have so far?
Of the seven people running for City Council in Modesto these two(Muratore and Olsen)are most closely linked to people who are concerned about lining their pockets with money they will take from us. Yes us the taxpayers, the rate payers...the Citizens of Modesto.
»
truthseekers's blog
Is This Local Modesto Real Estate Agent Someone You Would Want Representing You?
This G. Maudlin guy has quite the way with words.....
"Sounds like you,... except Ham didn't have the cheap Keystone Beer belly you have. No doubt he was smarter too.
How tall are you Dunce,....5 feet 6 inches?"
How tall are you Dunce,....5 feet 6 inches?"
why are there no African American or Hispanic tea baggies?
I just think the Republican right is going to assassinate him.
http://thehive.modbee.com/user/30804/track
Hope the Savage Weenie never comes back on Radio
Submitted by BikeRackII on Fri, 2009-09-18 22:37.
in the United States.
The dude should be waterboarded. He has helped ruin our once classy, fine Country.
»
reply
I saw comrade Dunce at Save Mart
Submitted by BikeRackII on Fri, 2009-09-18 22:42.
He was crying his eyes out. I said what's wrong Dingo Dunce? He said he was so saddened about "The Sav" (as he call him), cause he may never be back on radical, Republican, right wing talk Radio again.
He's looking for a new parrot. I pointed to a jackass parked in the parking lot and he seemed interested.
Hope the Savage Weenie never comes back on Radio
Submitted by BikeRackII on Fri, 2009-09-18 22:37.
in the United States.
The dude should be waterboarded. He has helped ruin our once classy, fine Country.
»
reply
I saw comrade Dunce at Save Mart
Submitted by BikeRackII on Fri, 2009-09-18 22:42.
He was crying his eyes out. I said what's wrong Dingo Dunce? He said he was so saddened about "The Sav" (as he call him), cause he may never be back on radical, Republican, right wing talk Radio again.
He's looking for a new parrot. I pointed to a jackass parked in the parking lot and he seemed interested.
I led the Peckerwoods in State turf wars against
Submitted by BikeRackII on Fri, 2009-09-18 23:51.
the Norteno's, Serrano's, Jalapeno's and the Cheetos. This started in 1917 and our last engagement was December 7, 2008. We finally took um out with our "heavy stones".
But don't tell anyone, OK?
Good Bye Eric
Submitted by BikeRackII on Wed, 2009-09-16 23:55.
Your very lucky you have a screen between you and I. Trust me on that one punk.
And you just gotta love a real estate agent that will "throw down" for his client! But look at the guy, I doubt if he could inflict any damage on anyone!
»
»
"Gmaudlin current screen name is BikeRackII."
Another Person Causes Their Own Demise
Looks like another guy who refused to follow LE officers directions and began to fight with them has died from his unruly behavior. It is very simple, follow directions, wait for your day in court. Tasers have saved more lives than they have taken. Many cases, if it were not for a taser, LE officers would have used their firearms, and rightfuly so. So don't buy into the the deceitful words of some who dislike all LE officers, tasers have saved many LE officers lives, and have allowed them to return home to their families after doing a job that most people would not.
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/860273.html
This is the third time in five months an inmate has died while in custody after law enforcement officials used Tasers to subdue the men...
On Wednesday, the deputies were trying to move Ham to a cell for his safety because he had "exhibited irrational behavior and was combative," according to the news release. Ham stood 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighed 200 pounds.
http://www.modbee.com/local/story/860273.html
This is the third time in five months an inmate has died while in custody after law enforcement officials used Tasers to subdue the men...
On Wednesday, the deputies were trying to move Ham to a cell for his safety because he had "exhibited irrational behavior and was combative," according to the news release. Ham stood 5 feet 9 inches tall and weighed 200 pounds.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Emerson Drake Of Modesto Attacks George Petralukas
AKA truthseekers, also known as Tex, has a problem with George Petralukas . It is not clear why Emerson Drake attacks this man, along with Modesto City council members, he enjoys attacking a certain female member Olsen. I can only guess he is a rabid misogynist. Here is the link.... http://thehive.modbee.com/node/15622#new
Look at my other post that shows this guy speaking to the council.....and watch how he is easily shot down by Olsen. Don't miss this human fart speak on the Morning mayor with Carmen Sabatino......... For my loyal followers, please dtop by The Hive and post to truthseekers' blog using his real name......or even use Tex... he really enjoys it!
ps..he is the guy with the bad shirt!
http://www.modestogov.com/sirepub/pubmtgframe.aspx?meetid=176&doctype=AGENDA
Look at my other post that shows this guy speaking to the council.....and watch how he is easily shot down by Olsen. Don't miss this human fart speak on the Morning mayor with Carmen Sabatino......... For my loyal followers, please dtop by The Hive and post to truthseekers' blog using his real name......or even use Tex... he really enjoys it!
ps..he is the guy with the bad shirt!
http://www.modestogov.com/sirepub/pubmtgframe.aspx?meetid=176&doctype=AGENDA
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Wants President Placed In A Cage?
This is what a local real estate agent has posted on The Hive's blog site. This guy is truly has a screw loose. If you navigate around The Hive, you will also see he is quite abusive to Catholics and women. And his comrade dunce blast is directed towards me and other conservative Christian white males. Real estate sales agent George Maudlin of Modesto appears to be an equal opportunity hater.
http://thehive.modbee.com/node/15526#new
Whatever we do, let's not get to close. new
Submitted by BikeRackII on Fri, 2009-09-11 17:02.
Lock Obama in a cage, paint him up so as to look "normal" to hillbilly Americans, and sent the cage around the schools in America so the children could see their leader in person.
Good idea huh, comrade Dunce.
Thursday, September 10, 2009
From Vanjo To JeJo To CaSun
Barry Hussein's radical ties just keeping oozing to the surface. As I have said all along, the people you hang with, call friends and mentors, say a lot about who you are. And we now see, those with eyes open, that Barry is a dangerous leftist radical from the ilk of the 60's devil spawns. And they are guiding the Chump and Chief.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/ny_tax_funded_ex_terrorist_ktSaBCwrr6MDK2gMz7xqhN
VAN Jones resigned as White House green-jobs czar after the public got a look at his history of radical activism, including his time building the so-called Apollo Alliance -- a coalition of left-wing interest groups unified around the green-jobs concept. But another, even more radical Jones (not related) is leading Apollo's New York state activities.
Jeff Jones was a domestic terrorist in the late '60s and a fugitive from justice throughout the '70s -- yet now he's a leader of an influential, taxpayer-funded group.
Jones was a fugitive from justice for 11 years. His own account at his Web site says: "As a leader of the Weather Underground, Jeff evaded an intense FBI manhunt for more than a decade. In 1981, they finally got him. Twenty special agents battered down the door of the Bronx apartment where he was living with his wife and four-year-old son."
With Mark Rudd and Bill Ayers, Jones in 1969 co-founded the radical Weatherman, which orchestrated the violent "Days of Rage" riots in Chicago, and later undertook an anti-government bombing campaign. Three of its members died when a bomb they were constructing to attack Fort Dix accidentally detonated in Greenwich Village.
And Jones is still proud of his terrorist activities -- saying as recently as 2004: "To this day, we still, lots of us, including me, still think it was the right thing to try to do."
Now, Jones is back to revolutionary organizing -- but with taxpayers footing the bill. He's the director of the Apollo Alliance's New York affiliate and a consultant to the national group.
Apollo unifies the three most powerful elements of the political left -- environmental groups, labor unions and street organizers like ACORN -- and points them toward a common goal that enriches all of them under the banner of "green jobs." (Van Jones was an Apollo board member until he joined the White House staff.)
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recently credited Apollo with helping write the stimulus bill and getting it passed. Yet the stimulus' "green jobs" provisions funnel federal tax dollars to unions, green groups and community organizers -- that is, the organizations that make up Apollo.
Green jobs serve a political purpose, but not an economic one. The evidence from Spain and elsewhere is ample -- each green job created destroys more than two other jobs elsewhere in the economy.
Jeff Jones counts among his consulting clients (along with Apollo) a half-dozen state and local environmental groups and the Workforce Development Institute (WDI), a union-controlled organization ("developed in partnership with the NYS AFL-CIO," it says) that works with state and local government and universities.
WDI's mission is to support union influence on state and local governments. It gets state tax dollars to do it -- to the tune of $4.8 million in this year's Education, Labor and Family Assistance budget bill.
WDI is so tightly integrated with Apollo that it features a full page of Apollo information on its Web site (wdiny.org), which appears to be the primary Web presence of Apollo's New York branch. WDI encourages its members and program participants to attend Apollo Alliance events.
As a consultant to WDI, Jones is helping write the grant proposals for federal stimulus funds -- funds authorized in the bill Apollo helped write, presumably ensuring that taxpayer dollars end up in the hands of groups that share Apollo's political agenda.
Anyone should be entitled to spend his or her own money on political organizing, but Apollo and WDI are spending taxpayer dollars to organize a coalition of extreme environmentalists, labor unions and social-justice street organizers.
That's bad enough in itself, but to have the effort spearheaded by an unrepentant domestic terrorist is a true outrage.
Phil Kerpen is director of policy for Ameri cans for Prosperity. philkerpen.com
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/09/sunstein-flunks-gun-rights-test/
Harvard Law School professor Cass R. Sunstein, the president's embattled nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, misfired one time too many.
Mr. Sunstein has been assuring Second Amendment advocates, including key Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, that he strongly believes the Constitution protects an individual right to bear arms. In a July 14 letter clarifying his positions at the request of the senator, Mr. Sunstein wrote: "Your first question involved the Second Amendment. I strongly believe that the Second Amendment creates an individual right to possess and use guns for purposes of both hunting and self-defense. I agree with the Supreme Court's decision in the Heller case, clearly recognizing the individual right to have guns for hunting and self-defense. If confirmed, I would respect the Second Amendment and the individual right that it recognizes."
There's no wiggle room in that statement, and Mr. Chambliss dropped his hold on the nomination based on Mr. Sunstein's assurances. But it turns out that the professor has held a certain contempt for the very viewpoint he suddenly claims to espouse.
A videotape has surfaced of a lecture Mr. Sunstein gave at the University of Chicago on Oct. 23, 2007. Here is what he said: "My coming view is that the individual right to bear arms reflects the success of an extremely aggressive and resourceful social movement and has much less to do with good standard legal arguments than [it] appears." Discussing the anti-gun laws in the District of Columbia, he said a critic of such strict gun control would say that a "trigger lock interferes with his efforts at self-defense against criminals. What on Earth does that have to do with the Second Amendment as originally understood?"
Later in the lecture, Mr. Sunstein said, "My tentative suggestion is that the individual right to have guns as it's being conceptualized now is best taken as a contemporary creation and a reflection of current fears - not a reading of civic-centered founding debates."
Mr. Sunstein's overt hostility to the idea that the Constitution protects an individual right to bear arms, including for purposes of self-defense, is not something that should be welcomed from somebody whose job might entail weighing in on the value of anti-gun regulations. It also makes his more recent assurances that he is a Second Amendment stalwart seem rather disingenuous, at the very least.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/ny_tax_funded_ex_terrorist_ktSaBCwrr6MDK2gMz7xqhN
VAN Jones resigned as White House green-jobs czar after the public got a look at his history of radical activism, including his time building the so-called Apollo Alliance -- a coalition of left-wing interest groups unified around the green-jobs concept. But another, even more radical Jones (not related) is leading Apollo's New York state activities.
Jeff Jones was a domestic terrorist in the late '60s and a fugitive from justice throughout the '70s -- yet now he's a leader of an influential, taxpayer-funded group.
Jones was a fugitive from justice for 11 years. His own account at his Web site says: "As a leader of the Weather Underground, Jeff evaded an intense FBI manhunt for more than a decade. In 1981, they finally got him. Twenty special agents battered down the door of the Bronx apartment where he was living with his wife and four-year-old son."
With Mark Rudd and Bill Ayers, Jones in 1969 co-founded the radical Weatherman, which orchestrated the violent "Days of Rage" riots in Chicago, and later undertook an anti-government bombing campaign. Three of its members died when a bomb they were constructing to attack Fort Dix accidentally detonated in Greenwich Village.
And Jones is still proud of his terrorist activities -- saying as recently as 2004: "To this day, we still, lots of us, including me, still think it was the right thing to try to do."
Now, Jones is back to revolutionary organizing -- but with taxpayers footing the bill. He's the director of the Apollo Alliance's New York affiliate and a consultant to the national group.
Apollo unifies the three most powerful elements of the political left -- environmental groups, labor unions and street organizers like ACORN -- and points them toward a common goal that enriches all of them under the banner of "green jobs." (Van Jones was an Apollo board member until he joined the White House staff.)
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid recently credited Apollo with helping write the stimulus bill and getting it passed. Yet the stimulus' "green jobs" provisions funnel federal tax dollars to unions, green groups and community organizers -- that is, the organizations that make up Apollo.
Green jobs serve a political purpose, but not an economic one. The evidence from Spain and elsewhere is ample -- each green job created destroys more than two other jobs elsewhere in the economy.
Jeff Jones counts among his consulting clients (along with Apollo) a half-dozen state and local environmental groups and the Workforce Development Institute (WDI), a union-controlled organization ("developed in partnership with the NYS AFL-CIO," it says) that works with state and local government and universities.
WDI's mission is to support union influence on state and local governments. It gets state tax dollars to do it -- to the tune of $4.8 million in this year's Education, Labor and Family Assistance budget bill.
WDI is so tightly integrated with Apollo that it features a full page of Apollo information on its Web site (wdiny.org), which appears to be the primary Web presence of Apollo's New York branch. WDI encourages its members and program participants to attend Apollo Alliance events.
As a consultant to WDI, Jones is helping write the grant proposals for federal stimulus funds -- funds authorized in the bill Apollo helped write, presumably ensuring that taxpayer dollars end up in the hands of groups that share Apollo's political agenda.
Anyone should be entitled to spend his or her own money on political organizing, but Apollo and WDI are spending taxpayer dollars to organize a coalition of extreme environmentalists, labor unions and social-justice street organizers.
That's bad enough in itself, but to have the effort spearheaded by an unrepentant domestic terrorist is a true outrage.
Phil Kerpen is director of policy for Ameri cans for Prosperity. philkerpen.com
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/sep/09/sunstein-flunks-gun-rights-test/
Harvard Law School professor Cass R. Sunstein, the president's embattled nominee to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, misfired one time too many.
Mr. Sunstein has been assuring Second Amendment advocates, including key Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, that he strongly believes the Constitution protects an individual right to bear arms. In a July 14 letter clarifying his positions at the request of the senator, Mr. Sunstein wrote: "Your first question involved the Second Amendment. I strongly believe that the Second Amendment creates an individual right to possess and use guns for purposes of both hunting and self-defense. I agree with the Supreme Court's decision in the Heller case, clearly recognizing the individual right to have guns for hunting and self-defense. If confirmed, I would respect the Second Amendment and the individual right that it recognizes."
There's no wiggle room in that statement, and Mr. Chambliss dropped his hold on the nomination based on Mr. Sunstein's assurances. But it turns out that the professor has held a certain contempt for the very viewpoint he suddenly claims to espouse.
A videotape has surfaced of a lecture Mr. Sunstein gave at the University of Chicago on Oct. 23, 2007. Here is what he said: "My coming view is that the individual right to bear arms reflects the success of an extremely aggressive and resourceful social movement and has much less to do with good standard legal arguments than [it] appears." Discussing the anti-gun laws in the District of Columbia, he said a critic of such strict gun control would say that a "trigger lock interferes with his efforts at self-defense against criminals. What on Earth does that have to do with the Second Amendment as originally understood?"
Later in the lecture, Mr. Sunstein said, "My tentative suggestion is that the individual right to have guns as it's being conceptualized now is best taken as a contemporary creation and a reflection of current fears - not a reading of civic-centered founding debates."
Mr. Sunstein's overt hostility to the idea that the Constitution protects an individual right to bear arms, including for purposes of self-defense, is not something that should be welcomed from somebody whose job might entail weighing in on the value of anti-gun regulations. It also makes his more recent assurances that he is a Second Amendment stalwart seem rather disingenuous, at the very least.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)