Between repubs and dems, all we hear is "stimulus check this, stimulus check that." So, I was talking with a buddy when I came up with a few thoughts. I will post a disclaimer; I have the right to change or adapt these ideas, since they are in their early development stage. WHAT EVER THE HECK THIS MEANS!
I would start by giving all Americans a one year exemption from federal income taxes. In conjunction with implementing a flat, or fair tax on all items purchased. Still working on the percentages, so remember, to think in the big picture realm here! This national tax would also nail the bad guys who make their money illegally and are not currently paying income taxes.
I would also go after home loan companies that received bailout money. A side note here, it was many a politician who pressured these companies into making these bad loans and the people who signed the deals also carry some fault too. But I would fix a starting date for when a home loan was made...possibly 01-01-02, until 12-31-08, and these companies would be required to forgive 1/2 of the current debt to the homeowner. No monies would change hands, just the on paper amount. I would also then exempt the companies from paying taxes for 2 years.
These above measures should put much more money back into the hands of us Americans, thus energize the economy much more so than the hum drum Stimulus packages we hear about all the time.
And if nothing else, if a local Turlock cyberhillbilly can make an attempt at some new ideas, you would think all of those smart Washington politicos could do the same? Well, maybe not.
Monday, January 26, 2009
A Few Words On B. Hussein Obama From Our Friend Across The Pond
Submitted by jheaton on Mon, 2009-01-26 18:50.
Politics/Social Action
Thanks to my pal M L for this.
The Daily Mail ( UK National Paper) wrote this editorial about Obama on 1/6/2009. (for confirmation, Google " London Daily Mail Obama ' s Victory")Obama ' s Victory -- A British view An editorial from the London Daily MailA victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher Jeremiah Wright, the mainstream media who abandoned any sense of objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless but would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups. A victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of the cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written about his achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in between winning a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his teeth. Victory for style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-raising over reality.A victory for Hollywood , the most dysfunctional community in the world. Victory for Streisand, Spielberg, Soros and Sarandon. Victory for those who prefer welfare to will and interference to independence. For those who settle for group think and herd mentality rather than those who fight for individual initiative and the right to be out of step with meager political fashion.Victory for a man who is no friend of freedom. He and his people have already stated that media has to be controlled so as to be balanced, without realizing the extraordinary irony within that statement. Like most liberal zealots, the Obama worshippers constantly speak of Fox and Limbaugh, when the vast bulk of television stations and newspapers are drastically liberal and anti-conservative. Senior Democrat Chuck Schumer said that just as pornography should be censored, so should talk radio. In other words, one of the few free and open means of popular expression may well be cornered and beaten by bullies who even in triumph cannot tolerate any criticism and opposition. A victory for those who believe the state is better qualified to raise children than the family, for those who prefer teachers ' unions to teaching and for those who are naively convinced that if the West is sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and terror will dissolve as quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist celebrity. A victory for social democracy even after most of Europe has come to the painful conclusion that social democracy leads to mediocrity, failure, unemployment, inflation, higher taxes and economic stagnation. A victory for intrusive lawyers, banal sentimentalists, social extremists and urban snobs.
Congratulations America
»
jheaton's blog
Politics/Social Action
Thanks to my pal M L for this.
The Daily Mail ( UK National Paper) wrote this editorial about Obama on 1/6/2009. (for confirmation, Google " London Daily Mail Obama ' s Victory")Obama ' s Victory -- A British view An editorial from the London Daily MailA victory for the hysterical Oprah Winfrey, the mad racist preacher Jeremiah Wright, the mainstream media who abandoned any sense of objectivity long ago, Europeans who despise America largely because they depend on her, comics who claim to be dangerous and fearless but would not dare attack genuinely powerful special interest groups. A victory for Obama-worshippers everywhere. A victory for the cult of the cult. A man who has done little with his life but has written about his achievements as if he had found the cure for cancer in between winning a marathon and building a nuclear reactor with his teeth. Victory for style over substance, hyperbole over history, rabble-raising over reality.A victory for Hollywood , the most dysfunctional community in the world. Victory for Streisand, Spielberg, Soros and Sarandon. Victory for those who prefer welfare to will and interference to independence. For those who settle for group think and herd mentality rather than those who fight for individual initiative and the right to be out of step with meager political fashion.Victory for a man who is no friend of freedom. He and his people have already stated that media has to be controlled so as to be balanced, without realizing the extraordinary irony within that statement. Like most liberal zealots, the Obama worshippers constantly speak of Fox and Limbaugh, when the vast bulk of television stations and newspapers are drastically liberal and anti-conservative. Senior Democrat Chuck Schumer said that just as pornography should be censored, so should talk radio. In other words, one of the few free and open means of popular expression may well be cornered and beaten by bullies who even in triumph cannot tolerate any criticism and opposition. A victory for those who believe the state is better qualified to raise children than the family, for those who prefer teachers ' unions to teaching and for those who are naively convinced that if the West is sufficiently weak towards its enemies, war and terror will dissolve as quickly as the tears on the face of a leftist celebrity. A victory for social democracy even after most of Europe has come to the painful conclusion that social democracy leads to mediocrity, failure, unemployment, inflation, higher taxes and economic stagnation. A victory for intrusive lawyers, banal sentimentalists, social extremists and urban snobs.
Congratulations America
»
jheaton's blog
Sunday, January 25, 2009
Awesome Words By Bishop Robert Vasa
This man of God clearly states the truth. Abortion is murder and has become legalized infanticide here and around the world.
Those who profess to love God, but back abortion, are liarsBy Bishop Robert Vasa
http://sentinel.org/node/9727
BEND — The Mass readings for the week between Epiphany and the Baptism of the Lord are taken from the First Letter of St. John. These readings are not always used for it often happens, depending upon the day on which Christmas falls, that the season of ordinary time begins immediately after the celebration of Epiphany. This year, however, the occurrence of Christmas allowed for a full week between these two post-Christmas celebrations and thus the readings from St. John’s first letter. As often happens, the daily Mass readings are both appealing and challenging. The reading of Thursday from I John 4:19ff is particularly appropriate in this year when the life issues are very much on the minds of pro-life persons.
The reason for the increased awareness and even concern on the part of the pro-life community is the specter of the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) which is highly rumored to be in the works at the federal level. It is this act which has stimulated the bishops of the United States to launch a massive postcard campaign calling upon the House and Senate to abandon FOCA. While further details about the dramatic impact of FOCA on our American culture can be found in many places, I will simply say that it would establish abortion as a federally protected right and, as I understand it, preclude state limitation or regulation of abortion. Further, since abortion would be a federally protected right, it is very possible that even Catholic health care institutions and Catholic Physicians would be mandated to provide this heinous service.
Thus I strongly urge all who have a glimmer of concern for the lives of pre-born children to engage themselves in this postcard campaign. This is not an action which would limit or alter present permissive abortion laws, which some so-called Catholic pro-choice persons might object to, it would simply preclude a dramatic expansion of that permissiveness. Thus it would be very difficult for any Catholic, no matter how much in favor of abortion itself, to find a reason to refuse to participate in this campaign. At the same time, I do not see how any Catholic senator or representative could vote for the passage of FOCA without recognizing that such a vote would constitute a direct and intentional declaration of their disdain for Catholic teaching. Such a vote would be tantamount to a public declaration of their intention to abandon the Catholic faith. It would be imperative that the faith consequences of such a declaration be allowed to fall fully on the heads of those who would make it.The writing from St. John applies: “Beloved, we love God because He first loved us. If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ but hates his brother, he is a liar; for whoever does not love a brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen. This is the commandment we have from Him: Whoever loves God must also love his brother.”We of the Catholic faith certainly know that love of God is central to our tenets, this is the appealing part. It is hard to imagine a Catholic saying, “I am a Catholic in good standing but I do not love God.” But the inspired scriptures tell us that whoever does not love his brother or neighbor does not and, indeed, cannot love God. This is the challenging part. The people of Jesus’ day understood this and it was this understanding that prompted them to ask, “And who is my neighbor?” For all of us, and especially for Catholic legislators in every strata of government, it is necessary to declare, in conformity with the Natural Law and the teaching of the Catholic Church that, the pre-born child is our brother, our sister, our neighbor!
It may sound a little strong to state that legislators “hate” the pre-born child but hate is an absence of love and love means to wish another well. There is nothing about abortion that wishes the pre-born child well. The preservation of abortion “rights” is already an absence of love for the pre-born child but the passage of FOCA could be construed as nothing less than active and positive disregard, even hatred, for these our brothers and sisters. To paraphrase St. John, “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ but votes for FOCA, thus showing a disregard for his pre-born brother or sister, he is a liar.” Lots of things can be rationalized in government but I do not see any way in which any Catholic could rationalize or justify an affirmative vote for FOCA.
It is not necessary for your postcards to be as outspoken as this bishop but you do have an obligation to participate in this concerted effort to show love for the tiniest and most defenseless of our brothers and sisters. President-elect Obama made it very clear, prior to the election, that he would happily sign FOCA and the millions of Catholics who voted for him hopefully did so for reasons other than this promise and certainly not because of it. It seems to me that it is particularly incumbent upon these same voters to make it clearly known to their representatives that their vote may not in any way be taken as a sign of support for FOCA.
Another way in which we show our affirmative love for our pre-born brothers and sisters is by way of our annual memorial on Jan. 22. This year the Diocesan Office of Pro-life Activities has scheduled a rosary and Mass at St. Joseph’s in Prineville on Thursday evening, Jan. 22. The rosary will commence at 6:30 p.m. with Mass beginning at 7 p.m. While I recognize that many parishes host similar memorial Masses to pray for the two-fold victims of abortion, the child and the mother, I invite any who can to join me at the rosary and Mass at St. Joseph’s in Prineville.
Regardless of how many years have passed since the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court Decision and regardless of how prevalent and routine abortion has become in this country, the simple truth remains, it is an act of extreme violence to the pre-born child and to the distressed mother. Thus, if anyone says, “I love God” and still favors abortion, he is, to quote St. John, a liar. May we all live out faithfully what it means to love God.
Those who profess to love God, but back abortion, are liarsBy Bishop Robert Vasa
http://sentinel.org/node/9727
BEND — The Mass readings for the week between Epiphany and the Baptism of the Lord are taken from the First Letter of St. John. These readings are not always used for it often happens, depending upon the day on which Christmas falls, that the season of ordinary time begins immediately after the celebration of Epiphany. This year, however, the occurrence of Christmas allowed for a full week between these two post-Christmas celebrations and thus the readings from St. John’s first letter. As often happens, the daily Mass readings are both appealing and challenging. The reading of Thursday from I John 4:19ff is particularly appropriate in this year when the life issues are very much on the minds of pro-life persons.
The reason for the increased awareness and even concern on the part of the pro-life community is the specter of the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA) which is highly rumored to be in the works at the federal level. It is this act which has stimulated the bishops of the United States to launch a massive postcard campaign calling upon the House and Senate to abandon FOCA. While further details about the dramatic impact of FOCA on our American culture can be found in many places, I will simply say that it would establish abortion as a federally protected right and, as I understand it, preclude state limitation or regulation of abortion. Further, since abortion would be a federally protected right, it is very possible that even Catholic health care institutions and Catholic Physicians would be mandated to provide this heinous service.
Thus I strongly urge all who have a glimmer of concern for the lives of pre-born children to engage themselves in this postcard campaign. This is not an action which would limit or alter present permissive abortion laws, which some so-called Catholic pro-choice persons might object to, it would simply preclude a dramatic expansion of that permissiveness. Thus it would be very difficult for any Catholic, no matter how much in favor of abortion itself, to find a reason to refuse to participate in this campaign. At the same time, I do not see how any Catholic senator or representative could vote for the passage of FOCA without recognizing that such a vote would constitute a direct and intentional declaration of their disdain for Catholic teaching. Such a vote would be tantamount to a public declaration of their intention to abandon the Catholic faith. It would be imperative that the faith consequences of such a declaration be allowed to fall fully on the heads of those who would make it.The writing from St. John applies: “Beloved, we love God because He first loved us. If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ but hates his brother, he is a liar; for whoever does not love a brother whom he has seen cannot love God whom he has not seen. This is the commandment we have from Him: Whoever loves God must also love his brother.”We of the Catholic faith certainly know that love of God is central to our tenets, this is the appealing part. It is hard to imagine a Catholic saying, “I am a Catholic in good standing but I do not love God.” But the inspired scriptures tell us that whoever does not love his brother or neighbor does not and, indeed, cannot love God. This is the challenging part. The people of Jesus’ day understood this and it was this understanding that prompted them to ask, “And who is my neighbor?” For all of us, and especially for Catholic legislators in every strata of government, it is necessary to declare, in conformity with the Natural Law and the teaching of the Catholic Church that, the pre-born child is our brother, our sister, our neighbor!
It may sound a little strong to state that legislators “hate” the pre-born child but hate is an absence of love and love means to wish another well. There is nothing about abortion that wishes the pre-born child well. The preservation of abortion “rights” is already an absence of love for the pre-born child but the passage of FOCA could be construed as nothing less than active and positive disregard, even hatred, for these our brothers and sisters. To paraphrase St. John, “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ but votes for FOCA, thus showing a disregard for his pre-born brother or sister, he is a liar.” Lots of things can be rationalized in government but I do not see any way in which any Catholic could rationalize or justify an affirmative vote for FOCA.
It is not necessary for your postcards to be as outspoken as this bishop but you do have an obligation to participate in this concerted effort to show love for the tiniest and most defenseless of our brothers and sisters. President-elect Obama made it very clear, prior to the election, that he would happily sign FOCA and the millions of Catholics who voted for him hopefully did so for reasons other than this promise and certainly not because of it. It seems to me that it is particularly incumbent upon these same voters to make it clearly known to their representatives that their vote may not in any way be taken as a sign of support for FOCA.
Another way in which we show our affirmative love for our pre-born brothers and sisters is by way of our annual memorial on Jan. 22. This year the Diocesan Office of Pro-life Activities has scheduled a rosary and Mass at St. Joseph’s in Prineville on Thursday evening, Jan. 22. The rosary will commence at 6:30 p.m. with Mass beginning at 7 p.m. While I recognize that many parishes host similar memorial Masses to pray for the two-fold victims of abortion, the child and the mother, I invite any who can to join me at the rosary and Mass at St. Joseph’s in Prineville.
Regardless of how many years have passed since the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court Decision and regardless of how prevalent and routine abortion has become in this country, the simple truth remains, it is an act of extreme violence to the pre-born child and to the distressed mother. Thus, if anyone says, “I love God” and still favors abortion, he is, to quote St. John, a liar. May we all live out faithfully what it means to love God.
President B Hussein Obama....Tears Of disappointment Are On Their Way
The Immoral One, who is our president, will not leave this great nation a better place when he is voted out in four years.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/01/20/barack_obama_inauguration_this_emperor_has_no_clothes_it_will_all_end_in_tears
Barack Obama inauguration: this Emperor has no clothes, it will all end in tears
Posted By: Gerald Warner at Jan 20, 2009 at 18:50:54 [General]
Posted in: Society , Eagle Eye
Tags:
Barack Obama, Freedom of Choice Act, Neil Kinnock, stimulus package, Tony Blair
This will end in tears. The Obama hysteria is not merely embarrassing to witness, it is itself contributory to the scale of the disaster that is coming. What we are experiencing, in the deepening days of a global depression, is the desperate suspension of disbelief by people of intelligence - la trahison des clercs - in a pathetic effort to hypnotise themselves into the delusion that it will be all right on the night. It will not be all right.
We have been here before. In the spring of 1997, to be precise, when a charismatic, young prime minister entered Downing Street, cheered by children bussed in for the occasion waving plastic Union Jacks. A very few of us at that time incurred searing reproaches for denouncing the Great Charlatan (as I have always denominated Tony Blair) and dissenting from the public hysteria. Three times a deluded Britain elected that transparent fraud. Yesterday, when national bankruptcy became a formal reality, we reaped the bitter harvest of the Blair/Brown imposture.
The burnt child, contrary to conventional wisdom, does not fear the fire. After the Blair experience there is no excuse for anybody in Britain falling for Obama. Yet today, in this country, even some of those who remained sane during the emotional spasm of the Diana aberration are pumping the air for Princess Barack. At a time of gross economic and geopolitical instability throughout the Western world, this is beyond irresponsibility.
To anyone who kept his head, the string of Christmas cracker mottoes booming through the public address system on Washington's National Mall can only excite scepticism. It is crucial to recall the reality that lies behind the rhetoric. Denouncing "those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents" comes ill from a man whose flagship legislation, the Freedom of Choice Act, will impose abortion, including partial-birth abortion, on every state in the Union. It seems the era of Hope is to be inaugurated with a slaughter of the innocents.
Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan is like one of those toxic packages traded by bankers: it camouflages many unaffordable gifts to his client state. With a federal deficit already at $1.2 trillion, Obama wants to squander $825 billion (which will undoubtedly mushroom to more than $1 trillion) on creating 600,000 more government jobs and a further 459,000 in "green energy" (useless wind turbines and other Heath-Robinson contraptions favoured by Beltway environmentalists).
It is frightening to think there is a real possibility that the entire world economy could go into complete meltdown and famine kill millions. Yet Western - and British - commentators are cocooned in a warm comfort zone of infatuation with America's answer to Neil Kinnock. We should be long past applauding politicians of any hue: they got us into this mess. The best deserve a probationary opportunity to prove themselves, the worst should be in jail.
It is questionable whether the present political system can survive the coming crisis. Whatever the solution, teenage swooning sentimentality over a celebrity cult has no part in it. The most powerful nation on earth is confronting its worst economic crisis under the leadership of its most extremely liberal politician, who has virtually no experience of federal politics. That is not an opportunity but a catastrophe.
These are frank, even ungracious, words: they have the one merit that, unlike almost everything else written today about Obama, they will not require to be eaten in the future.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/gerald_warner/blog/2009/01/20/barack_obama_inauguration_this_emperor_has_no_clothes_it_will_all_end_in_tears
Barack Obama inauguration: this Emperor has no clothes, it will all end in tears
Posted By: Gerald Warner at Jan 20, 2009 at 18:50:54 [General]
Posted in: Society , Eagle Eye
Tags:
Barack Obama, Freedom of Choice Act, Neil Kinnock, stimulus package, Tony Blair
This will end in tears. The Obama hysteria is not merely embarrassing to witness, it is itself contributory to the scale of the disaster that is coming. What we are experiencing, in the deepening days of a global depression, is the desperate suspension of disbelief by people of intelligence - la trahison des clercs - in a pathetic effort to hypnotise themselves into the delusion that it will be all right on the night. It will not be all right.
We have been here before. In the spring of 1997, to be precise, when a charismatic, young prime minister entered Downing Street, cheered by children bussed in for the occasion waving plastic Union Jacks. A very few of us at that time incurred searing reproaches for denouncing the Great Charlatan (as I have always denominated Tony Blair) and dissenting from the public hysteria. Three times a deluded Britain elected that transparent fraud. Yesterday, when national bankruptcy became a formal reality, we reaped the bitter harvest of the Blair/Brown imposture.
The burnt child, contrary to conventional wisdom, does not fear the fire. After the Blair experience there is no excuse for anybody in Britain falling for Obama. Yet today, in this country, even some of those who remained sane during the emotional spasm of the Diana aberration are pumping the air for Princess Barack. At a time of gross economic and geopolitical instability throughout the Western world, this is beyond irresponsibility.
To anyone who kept his head, the string of Christmas cracker mottoes booming through the public address system on Washington's National Mall can only excite scepticism. It is crucial to recall the reality that lies behind the rhetoric. Denouncing "those who seek to advance their aims by inducing terror and slaughtering innocents" comes ill from a man whose flagship legislation, the Freedom of Choice Act, will impose abortion, including partial-birth abortion, on every state in the Union. It seems the era of Hope is to be inaugurated with a slaughter of the innocents.
Obama's American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan is like one of those toxic packages traded by bankers: it camouflages many unaffordable gifts to his client state. With a federal deficit already at $1.2 trillion, Obama wants to squander $825 billion (which will undoubtedly mushroom to more than $1 trillion) on creating 600,000 more government jobs and a further 459,000 in "green energy" (useless wind turbines and other Heath-Robinson contraptions favoured by Beltway environmentalists).
It is frightening to think there is a real possibility that the entire world economy could go into complete meltdown and famine kill millions. Yet Western - and British - commentators are cocooned in a warm comfort zone of infatuation with America's answer to Neil Kinnock. We should be long past applauding politicians of any hue: they got us into this mess. The best deserve a probationary opportunity to prove themselves, the worst should be in jail.
It is questionable whether the present political system can survive the coming crisis. Whatever the solution, teenage swooning sentimentality over a celebrity cult has no part in it. The most powerful nation on earth is confronting its worst economic crisis under the leadership of its most extremely liberal politician, who has virtually no experience of federal politics. That is not an opportunity but a catastrophe.
These are frank, even ungracious, words: they have the one merit that, unlike almost everything else written today about Obama, they will not require to be eaten in the future.
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
Madness From The Hive
Too much ignorant babbling from my anti crew to pass up. Here is their verbal circus.....
http://thehive.modbee.com/?q=node/68
Superman and Katrina.
Submitted by jerseygirl on Sun, 2005-09-18 13:16.
Ominous signs of irony have followed Bush his second term- Superman died last fall and Katrina was born this summer. You could no longer hope for the caped crusader to fight for "truth, justice and the American way"- three things the Bush administration is against. Then Katrina washed ashore the garbage of his egregious administration. I won't blame a hurricane on human error, but I will on what happened before, during & after. A government's role is to provide for the betterment of its citizens, especially the "have not's", not just the "haves". If Bush were a true diplomat of integrity & compassion, he would have priorized the well-being of Americans' by not slashing taxes for the well-off. Taxes the rich avoid robs social & safety programs, and so the levee's were not maintained despite years of data that Louisiana could not sustain a category three hurricane; Katrina was a five. FEMA was stripped of its autonomy and thrown into the massively expensive pot called "Homeland Security". Where did all that money go? Speaking of money- how can it not anger you that Halliburton is profitting from yet another Gulf disaster? How can it not anger you that King George promised oodles of money to restore a devastated kingdom- yet immediately denied a bill to pay prevailing wages for construction workers in the Gulf states? Bush's America is a plutocracy; Republican spin will no longer hide this fact. Money that could help the aftermath of Katrina could have come from a "rainy day fund", what Clinton left in the name of a surplus, which Bush robbed to pay for his Iraq war. Regime change, anyone?
»
jerseygirl's blog
Nice Try
Submitted by jheaton on Tue, 2009-01-20 22:36.
While I admit President Bush is far from the man I thought he was going to be when I first heard him, i.e. lock down the borders and cutting foreign aid to Africa. You can't hang the blame on him for levee breaks. The state of Louisiana has known fo 40yrs that this day was comming. Many of their own elected officials diverted funds else where. Also, Mr. Bush has never read a spending bill he did not like. And since when is it a crime to be wealthy? Individuals who work hard have every right to keep their money. Corporations that are corrupt is a different story. The government should only help those who can not help themselves such as the mentally ill and the physically handicapped. I am tired of paying for people who are drug addicts, illegal aliens and just plain lazy. Cut off all of those programs and when they get hungry enough, they will work. And I do agree that massive contracts go to companies that have connections to politicians. I believe Gen. Wesley Clark's company just recieved a clean up contract in the states that were hit by Katrina.
»
edit
reply
A question to ask ourselves
Submitted by jerseygirl on Fri, 2005-09-23 15:50.
A question to ask ourselves is: what is the purpose of government? A wise man once said, "to protect the powerless from the powerful"; a non-partisan answer to a non-partisan question. Our bicameral system once had Republicans who were fiscally conservative for the greater good and Democrats who were socially active for the greater good of the people. Somewhere in time they made a U-turn and got lost. I am disgusted by both parties and though I do not for one second believe political corruption lies solely in the Republican legislative body- it's because of one greedy, vindictive, evil man, that the Bush House has run amok in malfeasance like none other. The reign of Karl Rove's political persuasion has stacked the House with egregious cronyism- from the CIA to FEMA. I absolutely blame the levees breaking on this administration, right down to the state level. The blatant stealing of hard-working tax payers to support pet projects and "special interests" of corrupt lobbyist is why America's infrastructure is falling apart at the seams, and why we're held by the balls from foreign countries who pay our daily debts. The Treasury Bonds are like the levee's of Louisiana- they will only carry so much. So why should Bill Gates not have to pay his fair share and contribute to our economy like me and my barely-getting-by paycheck? One percent of a billion dollars is A LOT of money not going into the economy! I haven't a problem with enjoying the fruits of your labor from honest work- I have a problem with Bush giving his elitist buddies a break at our expense. Not only do we pay for Iraq in bodies and taxes, but who do you think is going to pick up the tab to reconstruct the hurricane damage? Haliburton? As long as we, the citizens of a government for the people, by the people, allow apathy to fuel the avarice of silk-suited criminals, the powerless will not be protected from the powerful and therefore, we all lose.
»
reply
Great Reply!
Submitted by jheaton on Sat, 2005-09-24 03:04.
I am upset also that no matter what the party affiliation, elected officials "hook up" their buddies. I agree with you about the "honest" days work. I like you, look at my pay stub and say, what the !@#%. And you are spot on about lobbyist. I look at both political parties and there is not a nickles worth of difference. You are also right about President Bush hooking up his buddies. But please be fair and admit this poor behavior crosses party lines. For a far righty like me to admit this, it must be bad! I would like to compliment you on your well thought out and written blog, Touche! Who is your dream canidate for 2008? I will throw the first gernade and say,.... Alan Keyes.. your up!
»
edit
reply
Bridges of Hope
Submitted by jerseygirl on Sat, 2005-09-24 23:22.
The beauty of the Internet is that it gives people the forum to think and connect bridges. Thank you for your honest feedback. You are absolutely correct that poor political behavior crosses party lines. If our elected officials voted on their conscience, rather than their constituents, our government would work as it was intended. The fate of this country lies in power of the people keeping the eye on the ball; holding those responsible- accountable. As for my "dream candidate" for 2008- I need to give that some thought since not one person in particular comes to mind right away! But as someone writing from the far left, I can assure you- her name IS NOT Hillary!
»
reply
Right Agrees with Left
Submitted by jheaton on Sun, 2005-09-25 09:57.
Wow, I just received an ice shipment from Hades. We both agree on Hillary. It is also very nice to read and respond to a self labeled "Far Lefty" who is articulate and polite. Even though I may not agree with that side of the political spectrum, I hope there are many more people such as yourself. Since you have not named your dream canidate I will name my number two pick, Tom Tancredo. I am sure this will get you motivated!
»
reply
For the greater good.
Submitted by jerseygirl on Mon, 2005-09-26 16:27.
If only those "in power" would listen to the people who give them the power. Whatever my opinions, and that is what they are, I am open to listen to all sides. If we just listen to what we like to hear, then we become jaded in our bias. While I will not concede to go against what I believe to be just, my thesis as a human being is based on what a great philospher once said: "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." I'm sure we will have our differences of opinion but from that, I hope for us both to learn. If we come from the core belief of treating others as we like to be treated, then we may accomplish what this government is failing to do. Having said that, I must point out one of the most disappointing traits of Bush; he has been a divider and not a uniter. Whether it's Karl Rove writing what he says or other "powers that be" you and I are unaware of, this time is crucial for American citizens to come together for the greater good. That is what gave birth to this country and made it great: our right to think for ourselves. As long as we aren't hurting anyone- then life is good. Thank you for meeting me half way & hopefully, inspiring in others to do the same.
»
reply
Another Bad Trait
Submitted by jheaton on Mon, 2005-09-26 19:32.
I think another one of President Bush's faults is he listens to and takes bad advice from people who are close to him. It seems he is always campaigning instead of leading. I can remenber President Reagan telling the country he would fire all air traffic controllers if they went on strike. You may not have liked it, but he was up front about where he wanted to go as a president. I don.t care about the party, I just want a politician to clearly state their position. If somebody says to me they think I am a "Dufus" I appreciate the honesty! Though I will ask for proof and none will be found. By the way you still owe a presidential pick....My number three is Rick Santorum.
»
reply
Hmmm...
Submitted by jerseygirl on Tue, 2005-09-27 14:54.
I look forward to our healthy disagreements in months to come as we consider our candidates of choice! So far, two of the three that you named I know little of, but what I do know, I must say "hmmm..." As for Rick Santorum, well- we will have to agree to disagree. But that is great! My neighbors across the street are Republicans through and through- and we have had exciting, always civil, disagreements (as you can imagine)! But we always remember we are people with opinions, not opinionated people; I love them dearly and we look out for each other. So I welcome you to the club! By the way, I wanted to thank you for your polite words earlier and I would like to extend the same.
»
reply
Good Neighbors Rule!
Submitted by jheaton on Tue, 2005-09-27 15:21.
Sounds like it must get really interesting around the bbq! It makes life alot of fun when you can debate with someone and throw back a few cold ones and laugh. It must be great to have neighbors that see things differently than you. I can just imagine the wild pranks... switching the canidates' yards signs..placing a I Luv Hillary bumper sticker on their car! Halloween parties with the Reagan Bush 1 mask. How about another pick 4 pres..J.C.Watts.
»
reply
The bumper sticker prank
Submitted by jerseygirl on Wed, 2005-09-28 11:56.
The bumper sticker prank made me chuckle; I've ventured into that thought... tee-hee!. Well, you've certainly done your homework on presidential candidates, and I must humbly admit that I've been so immersed in current events and ensuing '06 elections that I've concentrated little on "the next prez". At this point, it's easier to know whom I don't want (Republican/Democrat) than to think of whom I would like. But I think you and I will share "cringes" on our choices- and a healthy debate I'm looking forward to! Right now, I can tell you that Diane Feinstein comes to mind a lot. As much as I would like to see a woman steer the ship for a change, I will not vote for "her" because of her gender. I am an equal opportunity voter! I have watched her for years and admire her convictions; she has consistently proven to vote more from her conscience than to cower to a party of wimps- something I respect. So for now, even if she isn't planning to run, she will be my first choice. To be fair to Republicans, and considering myself a "moderate Democrat", I will consider some names but I want to see how they fair in light of recent indictments of prominent Republicans: Abramoff, DeLay, possibly Frist and hopefully Rove. A true leader whose priority is to his/her country, and not his/her cronies- will surface like debris after a hurricane, from the decaying layer that's reigned in the Rove administration. So for now- I've offered a candidate and I hope you don't have to take too much Pepto Bismal after it! Have a good day!
»
reply
No Pepto; Yes Coor's
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2005-09-28 14:43.
I must say one thing about Diane, I wrote her office a letter years ago about a tax question, and I actually recieved a reply. She was the first politician to return a letter. I did not agree with the response just as I don't agree with alot of her positions, but she seems to respond very to her potential voters. Any time a politicans is blamed for almost anything it does not surprise me.
»
edit
reply
OK, I did win for sure Jerseygirl.
Submitted by Simpson82 on Tue, 2009-01-20 23:47.
I read the entire blog. Very, very interesting, I must say.
Like I said, just pay me when the bailout check arrives. About the time of your B'day.
"Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of crackpot than the stigma of conformity." - Thomas J. Watson
»
reply
I see hj is trying to edit past posts see "nice try."..
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 09:53.
From 2005?...hj..ashamed of something?
Reminds me of 10/11/08 sound familar hj? you deleted that one.
»
reply
It's now a 1/20/2009 post between year 2005 posts.
Submitted by Simpson82 on Wed, 2009-01-21 11:20.
Like Jerseygirl says, it "smarts" when you get it right "back at ya".
Doesn't surprise me one bit Truthseekers. Good spot on catch.
"Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of crackpot than the stigma of conformity." - Thomas J. Watson
»
reply
Typos....
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2009-01-21 14:20.
there gramps. Just clean'n up a bit. But then again, you are just an old angry dude lookin' to argue. Nice hobby. Maybe your buddy bike rack can let you get involved in his hobby. You would fit right in. Say cheese!
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!Bobby KnightUncle Sam's Boot
»
edit
reply
Well son to go back three and a half years to adjust typos..LOL
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 14:26.
yeah that makes sense...it's believeable too...Iwo Jima Time?
»
reply
I see you're still SPAMMING hj
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 14:29.
Trying to sell on the hive?
»
reply
Bike...
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2009-01-21 17:55.
I mean tmyseeker. You better hurry on out to that dairy farm in Keyes. Seems somebody is hiding chicken poop in the cow poop. It is another cover up that you are qualified to investigate and solve. That is when you get some free tyime from your newly found photography hobby.
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!Bobby KnightUncle Sam's Boot
»
edit
reply
It must hurt to be as wrong as you..but it does make me laugh
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 17:59.
You keep guessing wrong but then all your hate is wrong. And I see you're still spamming
»
reply
jheaton admit to Dan Day that you're SPAMMING
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 17:59.
for an attempted profit....you just don't make any...
»
reply
Still adjusting 3 year old typos?..Talk about an exciting life..
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:01.
You don't lie any better than you cover up your hate.
»
reply
I'm ready to re-enact Iwo Jima..I have a nice flag pole
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:02.
and you will make an amusing Mt.Suribachi
»
reply
Are you still selling on your personal site..yes you are
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:03.
that makes you a SPAMMER doesn't it.
»
reply
Good girl gone bad-
Submitted by jerseygirl on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:18.
that's what jhe wants to hide... unfortunately for her, he can't and the proof is in the post (from three years ago).
We used to be civil to each other and the Hive archives has all the posts to prove it; hard to believe they are one in the same (person). Back then, he was just another card-carrying member of Club Compassionate Conservative, BEFORE Bush reached the pinnacle of his malfeasance and still eligible to steal another election. jhe's hatred had yet to evolve.
Hence, why I re-posted Superman/Katrina; it just shows how the more his party ate their own and destroyed everything in their path- including the core foundation of why Republicanism even arose (to reign in government and be fiscally conservative), the more bellicose became jhe in some desperate effort to take attention on how badly Bush and his Republicans trashed America. The weaker the lie became, the further the venom spat on his critics until he turned into what he is today: Ann Coulter without a book deal.
"Nice try" was a nice catch and what I hoped jhe would do- try to delete his "past." Way to play ball, truth! (Or is that pops, or old man, or...?!?)
"Sometimes a revolution is just what is needed to clean-up the system with one, giant enema."- Johnny Depp, "Once Upon a Time in Mexico."
»
reply
Ain't
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:31.
no republican....pure conservative independant...and compassion for those who deserve it.So I will leave this cess pool where Sonoran shrews do their dance of deciet and others that snap photos of dreams incomplete.
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!Bobby KnightUncle Sam's Boot
»
edit
reply
http://thehive.modbee.com/?q=node/68
Superman and Katrina.
Submitted by jerseygirl on Sun, 2005-09-18 13:16.
Ominous signs of irony have followed Bush his second term- Superman died last fall and Katrina was born this summer. You could no longer hope for the caped crusader to fight for "truth, justice and the American way"- three things the Bush administration is against. Then Katrina washed ashore the garbage of his egregious administration. I won't blame a hurricane on human error, but I will on what happened before, during & after. A government's role is to provide for the betterment of its citizens, especially the "have not's", not just the "haves". If Bush were a true diplomat of integrity & compassion, he would have priorized the well-being of Americans' by not slashing taxes for the well-off. Taxes the rich avoid robs social & safety programs, and so the levee's were not maintained despite years of data that Louisiana could not sustain a category three hurricane; Katrina was a five. FEMA was stripped of its autonomy and thrown into the massively expensive pot called "Homeland Security". Where did all that money go? Speaking of money- how can it not anger you that Halliburton is profitting from yet another Gulf disaster? How can it not anger you that King George promised oodles of money to restore a devastated kingdom- yet immediately denied a bill to pay prevailing wages for construction workers in the Gulf states? Bush's America is a plutocracy; Republican spin will no longer hide this fact. Money that could help the aftermath of Katrina could have come from a "rainy day fund", what Clinton left in the name of a surplus, which Bush robbed to pay for his Iraq war. Regime change, anyone?
»
jerseygirl's blog
Nice Try
Submitted by jheaton on Tue, 2009-01-20 22:36.
While I admit President Bush is far from the man I thought he was going to be when I first heard him, i.e. lock down the borders and cutting foreign aid to Africa. You can't hang the blame on him for levee breaks. The state of Louisiana has known fo 40yrs that this day was comming. Many of their own elected officials diverted funds else where. Also, Mr. Bush has never read a spending bill he did not like. And since when is it a crime to be wealthy? Individuals who work hard have every right to keep their money. Corporations that are corrupt is a different story. The government should only help those who can not help themselves such as the mentally ill and the physically handicapped. I am tired of paying for people who are drug addicts, illegal aliens and just plain lazy. Cut off all of those programs and when they get hungry enough, they will work. And I do agree that massive contracts go to companies that have connections to politicians. I believe Gen. Wesley Clark's company just recieved a clean up contract in the states that were hit by Katrina.
»
edit
reply
A question to ask ourselves
Submitted by jerseygirl on Fri, 2005-09-23 15:50.
A question to ask ourselves is: what is the purpose of government? A wise man once said, "to protect the powerless from the powerful"; a non-partisan answer to a non-partisan question. Our bicameral system once had Republicans who were fiscally conservative for the greater good and Democrats who were socially active for the greater good of the people. Somewhere in time they made a U-turn and got lost. I am disgusted by both parties and though I do not for one second believe political corruption lies solely in the Republican legislative body- it's because of one greedy, vindictive, evil man, that the Bush House has run amok in malfeasance like none other. The reign of Karl Rove's political persuasion has stacked the House with egregious cronyism- from the CIA to FEMA. I absolutely blame the levees breaking on this administration, right down to the state level. The blatant stealing of hard-working tax payers to support pet projects and "special interests" of corrupt lobbyist is why America's infrastructure is falling apart at the seams, and why we're held by the balls from foreign countries who pay our daily debts. The Treasury Bonds are like the levee's of Louisiana- they will only carry so much. So why should Bill Gates not have to pay his fair share and contribute to our economy like me and my barely-getting-by paycheck? One percent of a billion dollars is A LOT of money not going into the economy! I haven't a problem with enjoying the fruits of your labor from honest work- I have a problem with Bush giving his elitist buddies a break at our expense. Not only do we pay for Iraq in bodies and taxes, but who do you think is going to pick up the tab to reconstruct the hurricane damage? Haliburton? As long as we, the citizens of a government for the people, by the people, allow apathy to fuel the avarice of silk-suited criminals, the powerless will not be protected from the powerful and therefore, we all lose.
»
reply
Great Reply!
Submitted by jheaton on Sat, 2005-09-24 03:04.
I am upset also that no matter what the party affiliation, elected officials "hook up" their buddies. I agree with you about the "honest" days work. I like you, look at my pay stub and say, what the !@#%. And you are spot on about lobbyist. I look at both political parties and there is not a nickles worth of difference. You are also right about President Bush hooking up his buddies. But please be fair and admit this poor behavior crosses party lines. For a far righty like me to admit this, it must be bad! I would like to compliment you on your well thought out and written blog, Touche! Who is your dream canidate for 2008? I will throw the first gernade and say,.... Alan Keyes.. your up!
»
edit
reply
Bridges of Hope
Submitted by jerseygirl on Sat, 2005-09-24 23:22.
The beauty of the Internet is that it gives people the forum to think and connect bridges. Thank you for your honest feedback. You are absolutely correct that poor political behavior crosses party lines. If our elected officials voted on their conscience, rather than their constituents, our government would work as it was intended. The fate of this country lies in power of the people keeping the eye on the ball; holding those responsible- accountable. As for my "dream candidate" for 2008- I need to give that some thought since not one person in particular comes to mind right away! But as someone writing from the far left, I can assure you- her name IS NOT Hillary!
»
reply
Right Agrees with Left
Submitted by jheaton on Sun, 2005-09-25 09:57.
Wow, I just received an ice shipment from Hades. We both agree on Hillary. It is also very nice to read and respond to a self labeled "Far Lefty" who is articulate and polite. Even though I may not agree with that side of the political spectrum, I hope there are many more people such as yourself. Since you have not named your dream canidate I will name my number two pick, Tom Tancredo. I am sure this will get you motivated!
»
reply
For the greater good.
Submitted by jerseygirl on Mon, 2005-09-26 16:27.
If only those "in power" would listen to the people who give them the power. Whatever my opinions, and that is what they are, I am open to listen to all sides. If we just listen to what we like to hear, then we become jaded in our bias. While I will not concede to go against what I believe to be just, my thesis as a human being is based on what a great philospher once said: "I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." I'm sure we will have our differences of opinion but from that, I hope for us both to learn. If we come from the core belief of treating others as we like to be treated, then we may accomplish what this government is failing to do. Having said that, I must point out one of the most disappointing traits of Bush; he has been a divider and not a uniter. Whether it's Karl Rove writing what he says or other "powers that be" you and I are unaware of, this time is crucial for American citizens to come together for the greater good. That is what gave birth to this country and made it great: our right to think for ourselves. As long as we aren't hurting anyone- then life is good. Thank you for meeting me half way & hopefully, inspiring in others to do the same.
»
reply
Another Bad Trait
Submitted by jheaton on Mon, 2005-09-26 19:32.
I think another one of President Bush's faults is he listens to and takes bad advice from people who are close to him. It seems he is always campaigning instead of leading. I can remenber President Reagan telling the country he would fire all air traffic controllers if they went on strike. You may not have liked it, but he was up front about where he wanted to go as a president. I don.t care about the party, I just want a politician to clearly state their position. If somebody says to me they think I am a "Dufus" I appreciate the honesty! Though I will ask for proof and none will be found. By the way you still owe a presidential pick....My number three is Rick Santorum.
»
reply
Hmmm...
Submitted by jerseygirl on Tue, 2005-09-27 14:54.
I look forward to our healthy disagreements in months to come as we consider our candidates of choice! So far, two of the three that you named I know little of, but what I do know, I must say "hmmm..." As for Rick Santorum, well- we will have to agree to disagree. But that is great! My neighbors across the street are Republicans through and through- and we have had exciting, always civil, disagreements (as you can imagine)! But we always remember we are people with opinions, not opinionated people; I love them dearly and we look out for each other. So I welcome you to the club! By the way, I wanted to thank you for your polite words earlier and I would like to extend the same.
»
reply
Good Neighbors Rule!
Submitted by jheaton on Tue, 2005-09-27 15:21.
Sounds like it must get really interesting around the bbq! It makes life alot of fun when you can debate with someone and throw back a few cold ones and laugh. It must be great to have neighbors that see things differently than you. I can just imagine the wild pranks... switching the canidates' yards signs..placing a I Luv Hillary bumper sticker on their car! Halloween parties with the Reagan Bush 1 mask. How about another pick 4 pres..J.C.Watts.
»
reply
The bumper sticker prank
Submitted by jerseygirl on Wed, 2005-09-28 11:56.
The bumper sticker prank made me chuckle; I've ventured into that thought... tee-hee!. Well, you've certainly done your homework on presidential candidates, and I must humbly admit that I've been so immersed in current events and ensuing '06 elections that I've concentrated little on "the next prez". At this point, it's easier to know whom I don't want (Republican/Democrat) than to think of whom I would like. But I think you and I will share "cringes" on our choices- and a healthy debate I'm looking forward to! Right now, I can tell you that Diane Feinstein comes to mind a lot. As much as I would like to see a woman steer the ship for a change, I will not vote for "her" because of her gender. I am an equal opportunity voter! I have watched her for years and admire her convictions; she has consistently proven to vote more from her conscience than to cower to a party of wimps- something I respect. So for now, even if she isn't planning to run, she will be my first choice. To be fair to Republicans, and considering myself a "moderate Democrat", I will consider some names but I want to see how they fair in light of recent indictments of prominent Republicans: Abramoff, DeLay, possibly Frist and hopefully Rove. A true leader whose priority is to his/her country, and not his/her cronies- will surface like debris after a hurricane, from the decaying layer that's reigned in the Rove administration. So for now- I've offered a candidate and I hope you don't have to take too much Pepto Bismal after it! Have a good day!
»
reply
No Pepto; Yes Coor's
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2005-09-28 14:43.
I must say one thing about Diane, I wrote her office a letter years ago about a tax question, and I actually recieved a reply. She was the first politician to return a letter. I did not agree with the response just as I don't agree with alot of her positions, but she seems to respond very to her potential voters. Any time a politicans is blamed for almost anything it does not surprise me.
»
edit
reply
OK, I did win for sure Jerseygirl.
Submitted by Simpson82 on Tue, 2009-01-20 23:47.
I read the entire blog. Very, very interesting, I must say.
Like I said, just pay me when the bailout check arrives. About the time of your B'day.
"Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of crackpot than the stigma of conformity." - Thomas J. Watson
»
reply
I see hj is trying to edit past posts see "nice try."..
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 09:53.
From 2005?...hj..ashamed of something?
Reminds me of 10/11/08 sound familar hj? you deleted that one.
»
reply
It's now a 1/20/2009 post between year 2005 posts.
Submitted by Simpson82 on Wed, 2009-01-21 11:20.
Like Jerseygirl says, it "smarts" when you get it right "back at ya".
Doesn't surprise me one bit Truthseekers. Good spot on catch.
"Follow the path of the unsafe, independent thinker. Expose your ideas to the danger of controversy. Speak your mind and fear less the label of crackpot than the stigma of conformity." - Thomas J. Watson
»
reply
Typos....
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2009-01-21 14:20.
there gramps. Just clean'n up a bit. But then again, you are just an old angry dude lookin' to argue. Nice hobby. Maybe your buddy bike rack can let you get involved in his hobby. You would fit right in. Say cheese!
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!Bobby KnightUncle Sam's Boot
»
edit
reply
Well son to go back three and a half years to adjust typos..LOL
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 14:26.
yeah that makes sense...it's believeable too...Iwo Jima Time?
»
reply
I see you're still SPAMMING hj
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 14:29.
Trying to sell on the hive?
»
reply
Bike...
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2009-01-21 17:55.
I mean tmyseeker. You better hurry on out to that dairy farm in Keyes. Seems somebody is hiding chicken poop in the cow poop. It is another cover up that you are qualified to investigate and solve. That is when you get some free tyime from your newly found photography hobby.
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!Bobby KnightUncle Sam's Boot
»
edit
reply
It must hurt to be as wrong as you..but it does make me laugh
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 17:59.
You keep guessing wrong but then all your hate is wrong. And I see you're still spamming
»
reply
jheaton admit to Dan Day that you're SPAMMING
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 17:59.
for an attempted profit....you just don't make any...
»
reply
Still adjusting 3 year old typos?..Talk about an exciting life..
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:01.
You don't lie any better than you cover up your hate.
»
reply
I'm ready to re-enact Iwo Jima..I have a nice flag pole
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:02.
and you will make an amusing Mt.Suribachi
»
reply
Are you still selling on your personal site..yes you are
Submitted by truthseekers on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:03.
that makes you a SPAMMER doesn't it.
»
reply
Good girl gone bad-
Submitted by jerseygirl on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:18.
that's what jhe wants to hide... unfortunately for her, he can't and the proof is in the post (from three years ago).
We used to be civil to each other and the Hive archives has all the posts to prove it; hard to believe they are one in the same (person). Back then, he was just another card-carrying member of Club Compassionate Conservative, BEFORE Bush reached the pinnacle of his malfeasance and still eligible to steal another election. jhe's hatred had yet to evolve.
Hence, why I re-posted Superman/Katrina; it just shows how the more his party ate their own and destroyed everything in their path- including the core foundation of why Republicanism even arose (to reign in government and be fiscally conservative), the more bellicose became jhe in some desperate effort to take attention on how badly Bush and his Republicans trashed America. The weaker the lie became, the further the venom spat on his critics until he turned into what he is today: Ann Coulter without a book deal.
"Nice try" was a nice catch and what I hoped jhe would do- try to delete his "past." Way to play ball, truth! (Or is that pops, or old man, or...?!?)
"Sometimes a revolution is just what is needed to clean-up the system with one, giant enema."- Johnny Depp, "Once Upon a Time in Mexico."
»
reply
Ain't
Submitted by jheaton on Wed, 2009-01-21 18:31.
no republican....pure conservative independant...and compassion for those who deserve it.So I will leave this cess pool where Sonoran shrews do their dance of deciet and others that snap photos of dreams incomplete.
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want them to bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!Bobby KnightUncle Sam's Boot
»
edit
reply
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
For Some President B. Hussein Obama Is About Race
Thanks to MM and Allah for this info. Rev. Wright was the beginning of four years of a racist based presidency.
//http://michellemalkin.com/
The full paragraph:
“We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to give back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man, and when white will embrace what is right,” Lowery said.
A reader points to this old civil rights chant that adds context to Lowery’s remarks — but makes the jab against whites all the more egregious
//http://michellemalkin.com/
The full paragraph:
“We ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to give back, when brown can stick around, when yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man, and when white will embrace what is right,” Lowery said.
A reader points to this old civil rights chant that adds context to Lowery’s remarks — but makes the jab against whites all the more egregious
Saturday, January 17, 2009
King B. Hussein Obama?
If this were not so scary it would be funny. The libs in the congress are moving to repeal the 22 amendment to clear the way for the corrupt saviour to rule America for a thousand years. Well, the next four years are going to feel like a thousand! The complete blind lust these libs and other ignorant followers of The One are infected with is nothing short of sickening. He has nothing more than a belief that government is the be all and end all of our problems. Sorry Barry, it is the hard working, God fearing, gun owning folks that make this country great. Not some forked tongue poltico hack that has very bad morals who can't say when life begins because it is above his paygrade.
Posted: January 16, 200911:40 pm Eastern
By Drew Zahn© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y.
As Inauguration Day approaches and Barack Obama prepares to assume his first term as president, some in Congress are hoping to make it possible for the Democrat to not only seek a second term in office, but a third and fourth as well.
The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary is considering a bill that would repeal the Constitution's 22nd Amendment prohibiting a president from being elected to more than two terms in office.
Posted: January 16, 200911:40 pm Eastern
By Drew Zahn© 2009 WorldNetDaily
Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y.
As Inauguration Day approaches and Barack Obama prepares to assume his first term as president, some in Congress are hoping to make it possible for the Democrat to not only seek a second term in office, but a third and fourth as well.
The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary is considering a bill that would repeal the Constitution's 22nd Amendment prohibiting a president from being elected to more than two terms in office.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)